Відео

Not true, he is not right, the equivalency of 2+2=4 in standard arithmetic of course is right, but this equivalence it changes depends on what system are you talking about, remember if you just talk in the imaginary world of numbers arithmeticly talking, 2+2=4, but let’s go to the real world if we put real denomination to that, 2 people + 2 people = is not always 4 because if one of those four people is a woman and one a man, it could be another human for a pregnancy thing, so 2 people + 2 people = could be 5, 6 or 7, mathematics create systems to simplify processes, and we make it work

They continue to say god, NOT KNOWING ITS NAME, NEVER SEEING, NOR EVER BEING SPOKEN TO. Delusional fools.

NEITHER CULT IS RIGHT.

Well we did invent math but we made the symbology so we can interpret real world problems, like Newton expressed gravity, like Laplace with transformations, math is just our way of understanding the world and its patterns, it can be applied to any discipline, but we did not DISCOVER it we literally made it and within it there are some flaws when we go into extremely analytical physics or even deeper calculus with imaginary numbers but that does not mean it should be discredited, more than 95% of real world problems easily are solved with newtonian physics or simple math.

Z/3Z has left the chat

The Egyptians 😂 Italian mathematician Luca Pacioli 😮😅 or with trading. When silver or gold coins was counted for goods. Its like asking who created language ✅️ you right mate is a language.. and man did create language. The question I have is, Is it always true? Are you sure? Language differ from man to man as a calculation differ form calculation to calculation.. it depends on what you want, what you identify with... 2+2=4 or 2+2=2 and 2 or just one big 2 like water 💧 what is 2?? What do you want to do with 2?? Is 2 and 2 the same as 1 and 1? Life can't handle the truth as its forever changing, maybe death is the only truth 😂 go sit in the corner and eat your bread 😂❤ just joking you know I love you

No one decided math and they decided what it would be called or seen as. It’s as simple as getting 4 baskets and counting them.

Man fuck math that shit wack

John 10:30 Jesus says I am the father are one

It was Jews who persecuted Jesus 😂😂

Humans assigned the symbols relevant to the values but the values will exist regardless of whether or not we have the words to describe them.

Jesus himself worshiped and prayed to God, and taught his followers to do the same. In Mark 12:29, Jesus quotes Deuteronomy 6:4, affirming the oneness of God, saying, "Hear, O Israel! The Lord our God, the Lord is one!" This declaration, known as the Shema, is a central tenet of Judaism and Islam, emphasizing the unity and uniqueness of God. This Quranic verse mentioned, Surah Al-Ikhlas (112:1), echoes this same message, declaring, "Say, 'He is Allah, the One.'" This shared emphasis on monotheism highlights the common heritage and values of Judaism and Islam. These two faiths reverence the same God, the God of Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad peace be upon them all.

Unless you’re Terrance Howard 😂

Man didn't create math. Math Is the language of the universe. If some alien culture bad 2 gublovs and another 2 gublovs they'd have 4 damn gublovs 😂

This is where the existentialists lose all credibility. The denial of objective truth is an untenable ideology. With math and physics it's pretty obvious; however, people can be convinced of the subjectivity of many things that are not subjective. Truth is not subjective.

This is dumb 😂🤦🏾‍♂️

Nah bro stop it 😂 the quaran says that Jesus will mention muhammad by name

More sky people mumbojumbo.

Yeah.. Is is Islam for you guys 😂😂😂😂😂

Romans 9 There will be trouble and calamity for everyone who keeps on doing what is evil-for the “Jew first” and also for the Gentile.

WTF.

L tautology explanation

Hitler didnt believe in Jesus. Sheik Uthie always lying.😂

Bruh if you have two stones on your left, and two on your right and then put them all in a bowl, there is 4 stones in the bowl. We didn’t just invent a law of the universe. Why does 2+2=4? Because it just does there’s no psychology behind it 😂

Imagine talking about like it isn’t a fictional character with a serious face 🤣😂 pathetic

THE ONLY WAY TO UNDERSTAND THE TRINITY IS TO HAVE THE HOLY SPIRIT REVEAL IT TO YOU. religious men will never understand THE TRINITY.

Man ya have money but no soul or mind

ua-cam.com/users/shortsi7oz1OWU-e0?si=QMwCC0Hr0hqBgjxl💡💡💡💡💡💡🖐️🙉🙊🙊

the apostle Thomas addresses Jesus as "my Lord and my God" And Jesus responds by saying you "believe because you have seen." What do you make of this?

You are disrespectful

It’s like saying who decided the sun is hot? It’s always been hot. But to answer his question God decided

Luckily the God of Christianity is all powerful enough to be able to become a man without ceasing to be God. Unlike Allah of Islam. If Allah came down and became a man, he would cease to be God because of his oneness.

ISAIAH 53✨

By that argument then 1x1 would be 2....

Radical Jewish don’t believe Jesus but nowadays Jewish people believe we all pray same one god ❤️🙏🏻

What a moron. First of all you are supposed to find his name mentioned in Torah and Gospel not Song of Songs haha

Song of Songs is talking about Solomon and his wife: 1. The woman exists in the time when Solomon existed (Song of Songs 8/11-12) It makes more sense that her beloved is Solomon than Muhammad who didn't exist back then 2. It was Solomon's wedding day (Song of Songs 3/11) It makes sense that this bridegroom is Solomon who had wedding at that time 3. He drinks wine (Song of Songs 5/1, 8/2) Muhammad didn't drink wine as it is strictly forbidden in Islam Solomon drank wine (Ecclesiastes 2/3) 4. He has a garden (Song of Songs 4/16, 5/1, 6/2) There is no information that Muhammad had garden Solomon had multiple gardens (Ecclesiastes 2/4-5) 5. The woman is called "the Shulamite/ha-shulamit" (Song of Songs 6/13) Muhammad didn't have a woman called "the Shulamite" Solomon had a woman called "the Shunamite/ha-shunamit" (1 Kings 2/17) "Ha-shulamit/ha-shunamit" means woman from Shunam/Shulam just like "ha-mitsrit" means woman from Egypt (Genesis 21/9) and "ha-kenaanit" means woman from Canaan (Genesis 46/10) Ancient israeli city Shunem (Joshua 19/18; 2 Kings 4/8) is identified with modern arab village Sulam in north-eastern Israel. "Sulam" is arabic pronunciation of hebrew "Shulam" because Hebrew "Sh" is interchangeable with Arabic "S": Yishmael (ישמעאל) - Ismail (إسماعيل) - Ishmael Mosheh (משה) - Musa (موسى) - Moses Yeshua (ישוע) - Yasu' (يسوع) - Jesus Elisha (אלישע) - Alyasa (اليسع) - Elisha Shalom (שלום) - Salam (سلام) - Peace Lashon (לשון) - Lisan (لسان) - Tongue Shanah (שנה) - Sanah (سنة) - Year Shen (שן) - Sin (سن) - Tooth Therefore, "the Shulamite" and “the Shunamite” are the same 6. He says "there are 60 queens and 80 concubines and virgins without number" (Song of Songs 6/8) Muhammad didn't have such number of concubines and his women (Khadija, Aisha, Zainab etc) were not queens or princesses Solomon had 700 wives and princesses and 300 concubines in the older age (1 Kings 11/3-4). Therefore, in Song of Songs, Solomon is younger and the number of his concubines and queens/princesses didn't grow yet to such great number 7. He says "my filly among Pharaohs chariots" (Song of Songs 1/9) Solomon and Pharaoh co-existed (1 Kings 3/1) and Solomon had chariots and horses from Egypt (1 Kings 10/28-29, 2 Chronicles 9/25) Now explanation of the word "mahamaddim" Its root word is the verb *"ḥamad" (חָמַד)* - to desire: "The wicked *desireth (ḥamad חָמַד)* the net of evil men: but the root of the righteous yieldeth fruit" (Proverbs 12/12) *Maḥmad (מַחְמַד)* comes from *ḥamad (חָמַד)* and means "desirable, pleasant" "And it shall be, that whatever is *pleasant (maḥmad מַחְמַד)* in your eyes, they will put it in their hands and take it" (1 Kings 20/6) *Maḥamaddim* (מַחֲמַדִּים) is the plural form of *Maḥmad* (מַחְמַד): "His mouth is *most sweet (mamtaqqim* מַמְתַקִּים) and he is altogether *lovely (maḥamaddim* מַחֲמַדִּים) (Song of Songs 5/16) For why plural of "Maḥmad" is "Maḥamaddim" instead of "Maḥmadim", it's just how some words are pluralized, for example, *Maḥšaḵ/מַחְשָׁךְ* (Isaiah 29/15) → *Maḥašakkim/מַחֲשַׁכִּים* (Lamentations 3/6) *Mamtaq* (מַמְתַק) and *Maḥmad* (מַחְמַד) are pluralized to make them intensive, i.e. "very sweet" and "very desirable". Some people say that -im means it is a name but it would mean that "mamtaqqim" is the name of his mouth *Maḥamaddeinu (מַחֲמַדֵּינוּ), maḥamaddeiha (מַחֲמַדֶּיהָ), maḥamaddeihem (מַחֲמַדֵּיהֶם)* are plurals with pronouns *"nu" (נוּ/our), "ha" (הָ/her), "hem" (הֶם/their):* "Our holy and beautiful temple, Where our fathers praised You, Is burned up with fire; And all *our pleasant things (maḥamaddeinu מַחֲמַדֵּינוּ)* are laid waste" (Isaiah 64/11) The adversary has spread his hand Over all *her pleasant things (maḥamaddeiha מַחֲמַדֶּיהָ);* For she has seen the nations enter her sanctuary, Those whom You commanded Not to enter Your assembly. All her people sigh, They seek bread; They have given *their valuables (maḥamaddeihem מַחֲמַדֵּיהֶם)* for food to restore life. «See, O LORD, and consider, For I am scorned.» (Lamentations 1/10-11) *"Im" (ים)* changes to *"ei" (י)* after adding pronouns: *Banim* (בָּנִים/sons) + *nu* (נוּ/our) = *baneinu* (בָּנֵינוּ/our sons) *Elohim* (אֱלֹהִים/God) + *nu* (נוּ/our) = *Eloheinu* (אֱלֹהֵינוּ/our God) *Maḥamaddim* (מַחֲמַדִּים/pleasant things) + *nu* (נוּ/our) = *maḥamaddeinu* (מַחֲמַדֵּינוּ/our pleasant things) *Maḥamaddei (מַחֲמַדֵּי)* is plural in the Construct State, meaning "of": "Ephraim is stricken, Their root is dried up; They shall bear no fruit. Yes, were they to bear children, I would kill *the darlings (maḥamaddei מַחֲמַדֵּי)* of their womb" (Hosea 9/16) "He hath bent his bow like an enemy: he stood with his right hand as an adversary, and slew all that were *pleasant (maḥamaddei מַחֲמַדֵּי)* to the eye in the tabernacle of the daughter of Zion: he poured out his fury like fire" (Lamentations 2/4) *"Im" (ים)* changes to *"ei" (י)* in the Construct State: *Banim* (בָּנִים/sons) + Yisrael (יִשְׂרָאֵל/Israel) = *Banei* Yisrael *(בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל/Sons* of Israel) *Elohim* (אֱלֹהִים/God) + Avraham (אַבְרָהָם/Abraham) = *Elohei* Avraham *(אֱלֹהֵי אַבְרָהָם/God* of Abraham) *Maḥamaddim* (מַחֲמַדִּים/darlings) + vitnam (בִטְנָם/their womb) = *maḥamaddei* vitnam *(מַחֲמַדֵּי בִטְנָם/the darlings* of their womb) "Maḥamaddim" can't be name because the previous word is "wə-ḵul-low" (וְכֻלּ֖וֹ) which means "and all of him is" or "and he is altogether". After that phrase there should be an adjective, not a name. Saying "all of him is Muhammad" or "he is altogether Muhammad" doesn't make sense, because you can't also say "he is a little bit Muhammad" or "little of him is Muhammad". It makes more sense say "all of him is desirable" (NKJV) or "he is altogether lovely" (KJV) If this word means Muhammad, it would mean that: 1) Solomon is altogether Muhammad (Song of Songs) 2) Ezekiel's wife is Muhammad (Ezekiel 24/16) 3) Jewish temple is Muhammad (Ezekiel 24/21) 4) Muhammad was laid waste (Isaiah 64/11) 5) Muhammad of Ephraim's womb will be killed (Hosea 9/16) 6) God killed everyone who was Muhammad to the eye (Lamentations 2/4) 7) Muhammad was given for food (Lamentations 1/11) 8) Muhammad is made of silver (Hosea 9/6) 9) All Muhammad of Jerusalem was destroyed (2 Chronicles 36/19) All these verses use the same word in slightly different forms which doesn't change the general meaning of the word. In English saying "book", "books", "our books", "books of" doesn't change the meaning of the word "book"

How Jewish gonna a accept the second coming of Jesus?? Since Jews rejected him previously

Allah Is one Allah has not partner he is one and absolute

The whole is equal to the sum of its parts

= women are queens and should always be respected and adored.

Same same but different 😂

One day these guys (ismalites and issacites ) are gone a see the true light not the traffic light like the small musilim lad said!. The day will come they will come to know that JESUS is ALLAH (for muslims) and (for Jewish) JESUS IS ELOHIM. Both ismael and issac are feeling sorry for you guys because you guys can’t even understand a simple term that GOD DWELT IN FLESH TO REDEEM MANKIND FROM SIN. No man is worth enough to fit into heaven after his /her death. Who are you guys to order GOD that he should be only in god form. He can be in any form because he is our creator. No man or women has the rights to command GOD that he should be in Godly state.

He made and error the equal sign doesn’t signal correctness else 1=100, we have never seen 7+15=35 ………… only correct thing here is that math is a language (((it’s a global language, we have incomplete mathematical theories/laws and other life forms((if any)) may even view or math as incorrect …… we are frogs in wells looking at the sky

Oh this insane religious people..😅

Allahuakbar ❤

Christian 😂🤣😜

Icl I understand everything he’s saying, it’s just not a great way to articulate what he means

JESUS!! The one True LIVING God!!

2+2 = quick mafss